Higher social complexity, through institutional, cultural and socio-economic development, improves the system in all these dimensions. Institutional development improves the social strength by bringing more stability, security and prosperity. Socio-economic and cultural development improves the social health by bringing more equality, justice, freedom, physical and mental health and social Man and society, tolerance and support.
The effects of social development The asymmetry between the dimension related with social strength and the dimensions related with social health, reflects the asymmetry in our value system see Values. Our value system has a hierarchic structure where values of safety and security precedes values of freedom.
As a consequence, social organisation is characterised for having social strength as the original state, and as the state to which all societies tend to return when they are threatened or they regress.
For example, in general lines, if we think in modern civilisation of social strength being represented by right-wing politics and social health by left-wing politics, we have that European political and economic strength originates from past right-wing politics.
Current European socio-economic development on the other hand comes from recent left-wing politics. And in the face of an uncertain future, with environmental deterioration and mass migration, Europe is turning once again to the right looking for safety, security and prosperity.
The same process happens in all societies. In all societies social strength is the original state, and the state to which they tend to return. We sustain that the higher the complexity of the system, the more it works for the benefit of the people.
The general process that increases the general well-being in society is a balance of interests. Higher social complexity lowers the hierarchic structure of the system and diminishes the unequal distribution of power.
As a consequence, the system works less for the interests of those above at the expense of others, and works more for the interests of the general population. Developmental Stages Development is a continuous process. And to analyse this process sometimes is useful to define stages.
Developmental stages are qualitatively differentiable dynamic states of the system see Development. Stages are characterised for having a hierarchic order, where higher stages are built upon lower stages.
So if we would have to define developmental stages in the process from social simplicity to higher social complexity, in terms of how the system works for the people, we could differentiate between the following: Societies in this stage would have highly hierarchic and undemocratic institutions with centralised power, social inequality, lack of freedom and cultures with traditional beliefs and value systems.
It is a similar stage than the previous one, with the difference that in the struggle for power, the middle sectors gains more influence. In this stage there is more room for democratic expressions, more diversity of thought and values, individual freedom, etc. Societies in this stage would have democratic institutions, de-centralised power, social equality and freedom, and a culture that ceases to be an instrument of control to become a means of development, with the democratization of information and knowledge and cultural values of tolerance, integration and support.
Stages 4 and higher: These stages would be similar to the previous one, with the addition of the system being also constructive to other societies and the natural environment.
Properties from development All complex systems are characterised by properties that varies on six main dimensions: In general, the more complex the system is, the more irreducible, autonomous, rare, unique, flexible, adaptable and stable it becomes. In social systems the same is true. Developed societies are more complex, less linear and more irreducible to the sum of its constituting parts.
One effect of this, is that the functioning of the system is less dependent on any particular individual or institution. Developed societies are more autonomous and less dependent on other societies.Man and Society essaysIn this paper I will try to explain the puzzle of whether individuals are products of society or society is a product of individuals.
I believe that in general, and in the beginning, the answer to this question, is that society is a human product. I will start by presenting ear. The present book is a remarkable attempt to underline the importance of man's contribution to society.
Man and Society: Political and Social Theories from Machiavelli to Marx: From Montesquieu to the Early Socialists [John Plamenatz, M.
E. Plamenatz, Robert Wokler] on ashio-midori.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
The classic introduction to modern political theory and the history of political thought from Machiavelli to Marx. Volume 2 covers the period from Montesquieu to the early Author: M.
|Archive for the ‘Man & Society’ Category||Man and Society The human being and the group.|
|Man & Society | Philosophy of Nature||Man and Society The human being and the group. The problem of man cannot be solved scientifically without a clear statement of the relationship between man and society, as seen in the primary collectivity—the family, the play or instruction group, the production team and other types of formal or informal collectivity.|
|Man & Society | Philosophy of Nature||Speak about moral and ethnical principles that should be kept Social behaviour is very important for everybody.|
|These practices are tremendously important to know how humans act and interact with each other. Society does not exist independently without individual.|
|Man and Society||Bring fact-checked results to the top of your browser search. Man and society Chief among them was Charles de Secondat de Montesquieu.|
E. Plamenatz. Man and Society - Free download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online for free.5/5(1). 6th Man Society, Memphis, TN. likes. Welcome to the 6th Man Society where our goal is to reconnect every coach, player, manager, and trainer that has 5/5(3).
Since complexity is a universal phenomena common to man and to other animals, we can compare the complexity of human society with animal social behaviour. Humans social behaviour differs only in degree form animal social behaviour.