The argument from contingency is the most prominent form of cosmological argument historically. The classical statements of the cosmological argument in the works of Platoof Aquinasand of Leibniz are generally statements of the modal form of the argument.
Share This article is complex and parts are hard to understand. Sorry, I can't easily have only articles that are right for everybody. There are plenty of easier articles if you prefer them. The argument from contingency attempts to argue that God exists from the contingency of things.
In essence, the argument attempts to address the question "Why are things the way they are? A1 Everything that exists has an explanation of its existence either in the necessity of its own nature or in an external cause.
A2 If the universe has an explanation of its existence, that explanation is God. A3 The universe exists.
T1 The The argument of contingency theories has an explanation of its existence. A2 is simply incorrect, as we can imagine a wide assortment of possible explanations. If "universe" is taken to mean "existence", it isn't clear how there can even be an explanation.
A3 is a generally unproblematic assumption, except when it is understood to mean that existence is subject to the laws that describe part of existence. It should be noted, however, that science does not currently provide us with good answers to the above questions. Religion, of course, doesn't either.
It is doubtful if such answers are even possible; a final explanation of existence seems to be a logical impossibility, as there is nothing outside existence that can explain it.
On Contingency [A1] The heart of the argument is the denial of true contingency. Everything must have an explanation - that some fact holds means that it holds because of its own nature necessarily or because it was brought about by some external cause it is contingent on that cause. It is the belief that "everything happens for a reason", that there is actually sufficient and, indeed, good!
There is a third way - no cause, which is true contingency. We often think of things as contingent in the sense that they could have been different. This is related to the issue of free will, the feeling that we could have chosen differently; but also to a more general intuition that things could have been different.
But this must be taken seriously, all the way - if they could have been different, then there must be no reason why they aren't different. Formally, they are what they are randomly, not due to any cause. This is how our universe behaves at the fundamental level, or at least that's what quantum mechanics tells us.
Things are the specific way they are due to no cause, they are truly contingent albeit under certain constraints, such as on-average conservation of energy and momentum and so on.The argument is called “The Contingency Argument For God’s Existence”.
Sometimes it’s referred to as “The Leibnizian Cosmological Argument”, the reason why it is called that is that the argument was first formulated by the mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. The Big Bang Theory has a lot of scientific evidence in its favor.
The Argument from Contingency. The modal cosmological argument or “argument from contingency” is the argument from the contingency of the world or universe to the existence of God. The argument from contingency is the most prominent form of cosmological argument historically.
The Argument from Contingency Copleston sets out his argument for the existence of God - an argument from contingency that is a type of Cosmological Argument. This is probably the most important passage in the extract for students to understand.
In general, contingency theories are a class of behavioral theory that state that there is no best way to organize a corporation and the organizational structure of the company.
An organizational or leadership style that is effective in some situations may not be successful in others. Contingency approaches emphasize that in order for organizations to succeed they must adopt a structure suitable for the environment in which they operate.
Two types of theories are referred as contingency theories: theories of . Nov 21, · The argument from contingency. 0. The ‘argument from contingency’ is a version of the cosmological argument.
It has various forms, and historians of philosophy trace it as far back as Avicenna in the 10th century. It is one of Aquinas’ five proofs, and is part of the repertoire of the classical apologetical method.